.

Welcome

'The Lawster' aims to interpret and discuss International Legal issues, whilst also providing useful advice for students aiming to break into a Law related field of work. I will also use 'The Lawster' as a way to connect with fellow Law students, in order to share answers and opinions, as well as providing useful advice on topics such as studying Law, revising for exams, saving money, writing a Curriculum Vitae, staying motivated whilst studying and where to find the best resources for studying Law.

For more information about the author, please visit the dedicated 'About' page.

If you like this blog, please share it to your favourite social media networks and click on the button below. You can also find The Lawster on YouTube, under the profile 'NMWolverson'. It only takes a few seconds to share this blog with friends, but it means a lot to everyone involved with The Lawster.

Private Law - Contract Law - Introduction To Offers And Contracts

Signing A Contract
Offers

a) Offer
An offer normally starts off as a type of proposal. For example, someone may propose to you the idea of going on holiday together; at first this is just a suggestion, however when terms are created and formed, this turns into an offer and in some circumstances a contract. You may agree to share the costs with your friend, at this point, the idea is no longer a proposal but an offer to pay. If your friend accepts this offer, you then have a contract, where your duty is to pay the agreed sum, and your friend also has the obligation to pay his sum.

According to article II – 4:201(1) of the Draft Common Frame Reference, “A proposal amounts to an off if:
      a) it is intended to result in a contract if the other party accepts it; and
      b) it contains sufficiently definitive terms to form a contract”

b) Invitation To Treat
An invitation to treat is NOT an offer. An invitation to treat is where someone invites someone else to make an offer and then will consider whether to accept reject. If it is an invitation to treat there can be no contract. If displaying a good is considered an invitation to treat, rather than an offer, the shopkeeper is free to change the price of the product, as he is not bound by contractual terms.

Examples of invitation to treat are: articles in shop window, advertisements in newspapers and magazines

Rules about offers
1) Offer must be certain, i.e. both parties know EXACTLY what they have agreed to
2) Offer can be made by any method: writing / spoken / conduct (e.g. at an auction by raising your hand
3) Contracts can be between anyone – (Principle Freedom of Contract): to a single person or a group
4) Offer must be communicated in order to be effective: Person who accepts the offer must know that it is an actual offer when he accepts it, e.g. reward poster for cat, neighbour finds and returns cat but does not know of reward, is not entitled to rewards because does not know of offer.
5) Must be in existence, i.e. within specified time period or if this does not exist, within a reasonable time.


An Acceptance
Must be an agreement to ALL terms of the offer; It MUST be communicated to the offeror – silence will not do. Conduct will suffice, i.e. performing an action that shows you accept the contract, e.g. attending school. Any way of communicating will do as long as it is EFFECTIVE. E-mails are effective when they arrive at the person they were sent to.

POSTAL RULE states that an acceptance is effective as soon as it is posted, if the post is a REASONABLE method to use.

Consideration
Both parties must contribute (put something into) to the contract. Both sides must show that they have given something in return for the other person’s promise. In fact this is the whole purpose of the contract. Consideration must be worth something (value) but it does not have to be worth the same on both sides (adequate); If both sides are happy with the agreement it does not matter what the value is.

Following are NOT good consideration:

Consideration in the past – If the thing being offered already took place before the contract was signed then it cannot be consideration.

If you promise to do something which legally you have to do (a duty to do) then this can’t be consideration.

Cessation of an offer
An offer Ceases when:
1) When time limit for completion expires or lapses
2) If the offer is withdrawn before it is accepted – REVOKED – the person who the offer is being made to must know it is being revoked
3) When it is rejected; When the person selling says no to an offer
4) When a counter offer is made by the offeree, this ends the first contract


Contracts

Definition = According to article II - 1:101 of the Draft Common Frame Reference, "A contract is an agreement which is intended to give rise to a binding legal relationship, or to have some other legal effect. It is a bilateral or multilateral juridical act."

Intention to create legal relations
It is always accepted that in a business agreements it is always presumed by both parties that the agreement is legally binding unless one side can show that it did not intend this. Social and domestic agreements take place in the family and are not normally binding and cannot normally legally be enforced in courts.

Terms of a contract
(i) Express terms = These are very specific and easily understandable by both sides. Can be written or verbal.

(ii) Implied Term = This is not obvious, normally unmentioned and not written, but is assumed to be part of the contract. E.g. that there exists trust between a manager and a worker.

(iii) Conditions = These are the most important terms in a contract and are crucial to the contract taking place. If one side breaks a condition, the other can cancel and is entitled to sue.

(iv) Warranties = Less important part of contract. If broken the contract still carries on but innocent party can sue.

Consequences of entering into a contract:
  • the intended legal effect, as agreed by the parties to the contract
  • but also other legal effects, which are not intended by the parties, but is supplied by mandatory or dispositive law
Discharge (ending) of contracts
(i) Performance
= Contract ends when both sides have done everything they needed to do to finish the contract: Whole contract (all parts) MUST be completed; must be performed within a reasonable or specified time.

= Both parties agree / decide to end the contract before it has been completed – can include compensation

(iii) Frustration = Something happens that means the contract cannot be finished or completed if:
  • Property involved in contract is destroyed e.g. by fire
  • Person due to perform / finish contract because they are ill
  • A law is passed that would make the performance (completing) a contract illegal.

Breach of contract
This happens when a CONDITION in the contract is broken. Innocent party can decide whether to continue with contract or end it

Damages:
Innocent party can claim for damages for “natural and foreseeable “ loss
Can claim for specific performance / injunction / rescission
 
Exclusion Clauses

A clause written in a contract that says how a person is not liable; this is disliked by courts.

Exclusion Clauses are limited by:
Unfair Contact Terms Act
  • person cannot be excluded from liability if death or serious injury is a result of negligence
  • exclusion clause has to be reasonable
  • in consumer law the liability of a person cannot be limited if the outcome of the contract is very different from that that was reasonably expected (performance)

 
Third Party Rights in a contract

The contract says they have rights or gives them a benefit provided they are made clear who they are in the contract:
  • By name
  • As a member of a group or class of people
  • OR Answers to a particular description 
    Minors’ capacity
    Those under the age of eighteen are able to make a contract but:
    • The contract has to be for necessaries, e.g. food / clothing / housing / legal advice and is binding OR
    • The contract has to be a beneficial contract of service, e.g. work / training / apprenticeships or something similar and is binding.
    • All other contracts are not binding and are VOIDABLE and a minor can pull out of the contract at any time.

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    Parliament In LondonSovereignty is a key concept in all constitutions; it defines the location of supreme constitutional power. Constitutions define the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government, whilst the sovereign body, or any body that shares sovereignty, has the ability to shape the constitution itself. In this way, it defines the powers of subordinate bodies. In the United Kingdom, sovereignty is located in parliament, or technically in the ‘Crown in Parliament’. Parliamentary sovereignty is strictly a form of legal sovereignty; it means that parliament has the ability to make, amend or dissolve and law it wishes. Parliamentary sovereignty is, without a doubt, the most important principle in the constitution of the United Kingdom. As J. S. Mill (1806-73) described it, ‘Parliament can do anything except turn a man into a woman’.


    Where does the sovereignty come from?
    The prime political leader to solve this problem was Thomas Hobbes. His book is called Leviathan, in which he compared the state to Leviathan. “In Leviathan, Hobbes set out his doctrine of the foundation of states and legitimate governments - based on social contract theories. Leviathan was written during the English Civil War; much of the book is occupied with demonstrating the necessity of a strong central authority to avoid the evil of discord and civil war. Beginning from a mechanistic understanding of human beings and the passions, Hobbes postulates what life would be like without government, a condition which he calls the state of nature. In that state, each person would have a right, or license, to everything in the world. This inevitably leads to conflict, a "war of all against all" (bellum omnium contra omnes), and thus lives that are "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short".”1 To escape this state of war, men in the state of nature accede to a social contract and establish a civil society. “According to Hobbes, society is a population beneath a sovereign authority, to whom all individuals in that society cede their natural rights for the sake of protection. Any abuses of power by this authority are to be accepted as the price of peace. However, he also states that in severe cases of abuse, rebellion is expected. In particular, the doctrine of separation of powers is rejected: the sovereign must control civil, military, judicial and ecclesiastical powers.”2

    Hobbes is the first great political thinker who doubts that a human is a priori designed to live in a political order, society, that the human is a political creature. Ergo the state is a built, artificial and an unnatural way of living, but the only one that enables humans to leave peacefully.

    Each state is based on ratio, because this is the only way of retaining our life. State is a necessary, but not always a sufficient means to curb social war. According to Hobbes states in the medieval world have failed, because they did not manage to prevent their own death; the death of their political order. Then what is a good state? - Hobbes’s answer: sovereign states; states that are not bound by religion or old privileges. Why? How? Because human beings are not designed to live together, because state is only necessary for installing peace; people bring about the state – Leviathan – in which one person has the sovereignty.

    The origin of sovereignty, as viewed by Hobbes, is democratic – this is a political order, in which every citizen gives up his or her natural rights and chooses state instead. So the king brings about our rights to decide, because we have transferred to him our rights to decide. Even if a citizen disagrees, he still has to comply with his sovereign’s decisions – this is in essence the social contract. The state decides on right and wrong and because the origin of the state is democratic, it exists only as long as its citizens want it. However, the alternative is worse – a war and death. Hobbes believes that it is either civil war, or strong order.

    Hobbes’s beliefs might sound totalitarian. However, Hobbes also states that there is no such thing like objective truth, ultimate veritas. We cannot know whether state is a good thing or not, because truth does not exist. Only the sovereign decides what is true. The sovereign cannot force us to believe, but can command us to comply with his orders. Hobbes introduces the difference between faith and confession. Faith is individual and unenforceable, while confession is enforceable. So he introduces the first human right, the first universal human freedom – the freedom of conscience. The state cannot rule our conscience, only our actions; it can bind us to a confession, not to a faith. As a result, faith becomes neutral. It is Christianity, not Catholicism or Protestantism. Before Hobbes, laws were holy, as they were Christian, there were no contradictions: Obey the state, obey the religion. After Hobbes the binding force of the law comes not from Veritas Christiania, but from Auctoritas. This is the logical and conceptual basis of positive law. Hobbes neutralizes the state and gives foundation for the possibility of the separation of the law and the state from the religion and faith. He makes clear that state is not natural, but cultural a human invention to protect people from war and extermination. He says that state is a mortal god. He is also the first thinker to distinguish between public and private space – a person is in one and the same time a citizen and individual. Jean Bodin is the first one to distinguish between public and private law.

    Hobbes’s ideas give basis for the next idea, namely that sovereignty does not only originate from people, the people are the sovereign. This is the idea on which the American and the French constitutions are based on. This principle is legalized in the idea of written Constitution that originates from the people.

    Examples:
    USA’s Constitution, the first Constitution ever written, states: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” This is a legal fiction – of course not everybody signed the Constitution! It simply shows that the sovereignty comes from the people. Although a small part of the USA citizens could actually vote, still it was true from a legal point of view that people were sovereign, because their representatives acted on their behalf.


    Sources:
    Infidels.org
    Leviathan
    OregonState.edu
    SparkNotes
    Wikipedia

    Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More